In one of the weirder moments of Mark Zuckerberg's congressional testimony on Wednesday, the Facebook CEO suggested there might be some really shady stuff going down at one of the oldest and most well respected universities in the world.
"There’s a whole program associated with Cambridge University where a number of researchers — not just Aleksandr Kogan, although to our current knowledge he’s the only one who sold the data to Cambridge Analytica — there are a number of the researchers who are building similar apps,” Zuckerberg said. "We do need to understand whether there is something bad going on at Cambridge University overall that will require a stronger action from us."
SEE ALSO: Scientist at centre of Facebook scandal didn't think data would be used to target votersThe organization that Zuckerberg is referring to is the University of Cambridge Psychometrics Center. According to the center's website, it is a "Strategic Research Network at the University of Cambridge dedicated to research, teaching and product development in both pure and applied psychological assessment." That is, it conducts psychological research by assessing social media and online activity.
The center's researchers also apparently know how to really get down during the holidays:
Cambridge University isn't having any of Zuckerberg's sass. In an emailed statement to Mashable, it said:
We would be surprised if Mr Zuckerberg was only now aware of research at the University of Cambridge looking at what an individual’s Facebook data says about them. Our researchers have been publishing such research since 2013 in major peer-reviewed scientific journals, and these studies have been reported widely in international media. These have included one study in 2015 led by Dr Aleksandr Spectre (Kogan) and co-authored by two Facebook employees.
At this juncture, it makes sense that Zuckerberg would want to distance himself and his company from a research organization devoted to using data to understand individual psychology. Zuckerberg faced hard questioning in Congress particularly around the extent of data that Facebook collects on its users, both within and outside of the the social network's apps.
But Facebook's utilization (and manipulation) of its users' data for psychological research is already well-established — including with Cambridge University specifically.
"We can confirm that researchers at the Psychometrics Centre had several discussions with Facebook ahead of and around the time of the publication of their 2013 paper," Cambridge said. "Facebook also responded in detail to press queries of the study at the time."
Cambridge is also not taking the pillorying of researcher Aleksandr Kogan at face value. Kogan is accused of selling data he collected from his "thisismydigitallife" quiz app to Cambridge Analytica.
"We wrote to Facebook on 21 March to ask it to provide evidence to support its allegations about Dr Kogan," Cambridge said. "We have yet to receive a response."
Your move, Zuck.
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Cambridge University responds to Mark Zuckerberg's accusations-鼓盆之戚网
sitemap
文章
4
浏览
873
获赞
6716
GoFundMe bans anti
GoFundMe is cracking down on anti-vaxxers.The popular fundraising website says it will no longer allCalculate your stimulus check before the IRS relaunches its website
Overcoming the briefest of Trump temper tantrums, Congress has finally passed a new coronavirus reliUber Eats workers keep riding in Australia's hazardous air with little support
Chemists and hardware stores across Australia are selling out of masksas the bushfire crisis continuFormer ADT employee admits he watched customers have sex for years through their cameras
It's the stuff of nightmares. A former ADT technician pleaded guilty Thursday to accessing customersTwoSeven review: Group streaming for all of your favorite services
The search for the perfect group streaming service for the age of social distancing isn't over, butPhoto of Trump's shockingly orange face launches a thousand memes
Donald Trump's face is making America do a double take again.On Friday, photographer William Moon, wDemi Lovato performed at the Super Bowl a decade after tweeting about it
Demi Lovato had big plans to sing at the Super Bowl, ten years ago. Lovato's powerful rendition of tTwitter 'exploring' adding a dislike button or downvote system
Because sometimes getting ratioed isn't explicit enough. Twitter is currently "exploring" adding a dChris Evans passionately defends Cool Ranch Doritos amidst heated chip debate
Chris Evans loves Cool Ranch Doritos, and he's not about to apologize for his good taste.After comedTito's Vodka would like to remind you that it *isn't* a replacement for hand sanitizer
Tito's Vodka would like to remind the general public that you can'tdouse your hands in vodka in placUber Eats workers keep riding in Australia's hazardous air with little support
Chemists and hardware stores across Australia are selling out of masksas the bushfire crisis continuFacebook and Apple's PR war seriously heats up
Facebook and Apple's public brawl over privacy concerns and monopoly power just got even more intensMeghan McCain's complaining wedding guest is now a beautiful meme
If you're a guest at someone's wedding, you probably shouldn't insult them in front of thousands ofShader Compilation and Why It Causes Stuttering, Explained
You just shelled out your hard-earned dollars for the latest AAA game to play on your treasured gamiThese custom masks may not beat Face ID, but they could do some good
It might have started as a novelty idea, but a Twitter pitch for "Face ID compatible respirator mask