Twitter tests filter to bury unwanted DMs even further

2025-04-28 05:50:50admin

So, you say you're already a pro at ignoring your unsolicited and unwanted Twitter direct messages. But what if there was a way to ignore them even harder?

It's your lucky day. The social media giant that brought us such hits as the hashtag and the retweet with commentfeature is back at it again with a new hotness that's sure to change the Twitter game. Specifically, the company announced Thursday the test of a new DM filter that could help you achieve your dream of never seeing another direct message again.

"Unwanted messages aren’t fun," read the tweet announcing the test. "So we’re testing a filter in your DM requests to keep those out of sight, out of mind."

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Essentially, the feature adds a subfolder to one of your two Twitter inboxes. In other words, you'll still have the "Messages" folder that you first see when you click "Messages" on the sidebar on desktop. Then, of course, you also have a "Message requests" folder that contains DMs from all the weirdos. Lastly, and this is the new part, within the "requests" folder there is a "show" option that will reveal whatever even weirder messages the company decided merited being relegated to the Twitter inbox basement.

Tweet may have been deleted

Ignoring Twitter DMs has never been so easy.

SEE ALSO: Twitter test gives you the power to quiet reply guys

Of course, you couldjust tweak your settings so that you no longer have open direct messages. But hey, why make it so that people can't message you when you could make it so they thinkthey messaged you but in reality there's no chance in hell you'll ever see their (likely) extremely dumb message?

That sounds way more fun.

Featured Video For You

Twitter suggests following ‘interests’ rather than people