Facebook will surely be bracing itself for some fresh backlash from the public next week following a number of revealing legal documents being unsealed. Those documents are expected to detail how Facebook made money off children without ongoing and clear consent from a parent or guardian.
The documents are being unsealed thanks to the work of Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting. They form part of a 2012 class action lawsuit which was filed by two children through their parents. It represented a class of children who were all under 18, Facebook users, and who had purchased Facebook Credits on their accounts.
Facebook settled the case in 2016, but the documents remained sealed. Reveal requested the documents be unsealed last year because, "there is increased public interest in Facebook's business practices in the wake of high-profile scandals, including fake news published on the site and the leaking of user data." The court agreed on Monday, Jan. 14, and Facebook has 10 days to make the documents available publicly. There's thought to be over 100 pages.
Four documents that have already been unsealed give us a good idea of what to expect in the coming days. The system used by Facebook to charge for in-app purchases and Facebook Credits proved very confusing for children and their parents.
When an initial payment is made by the parent, or child using their parent's credit card, Facebook stores the payment information. The card is then repeatedly charged as the game is played without it being made clear new transactions are occurring. As far as the child was concerned, they were just using up the virtual credit purchased with the initial transaction. This led to surprise credit card bills where hundreds or even thousands of dollars had been racked up playing games on Facebook.
As you'd expect, parents receiving these huge bills contacted Facebook for a refund because the charges weren't authorized, but Facebook refused. In the case of Angry Birds, which is one of Facebook's most popular games, the average age of the player was just five-years-old, and yet they were allowed to keep buying without consent beyond that first transaction. The key point here being, no evidence was required by the social network that the parent was continuing to authorize each transaction.
It's likely these examples are just the tip of the iceberg and much more detail will be revealed once Facebook makes the 100+ new pages available to view. However, it's also worth pointing out that Facebook convinced the judge to keep some records sealed because they, "contained information that would cause the social media giant harm, outweighing the public benefit."
We may never know how deep this rabbit hole goes, but we're sure to know a lot more in the coming days.
Copyright © 2023 Powered by
Unsealed docs will detail how Facebook made money off children-鼓盆之戚网
sitemap
文章
384
浏览
1
获赞
5688
Harry and Meghan share a new pic of baby Archie for Mother's Day
Baby feet: a great way to celebrate Mother's Day.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex posted a new photo oHere's why San Francisco's vote to ban facial
San Francisco just voted to ban facial-recognition technology.The city that has for many come to symGoogle Lens gets useful new tipping, translating features
A whole bunch of cool and usefulnew features are coming to Google Lens.At this year's I/O developerGoogle says its Files app can now actually clean your phone's screen
Google's Files app is pretty good for getting rid of those unnecessary files that pile up on your phEU is investigating Apple Pay and App Store for breaking competition rules
The European Commission has launched two formal investigations into Apple's business practices overHere's why San Francisco's vote to ban facial
San Francisco just voted to ban facial-recognition technology.The city that has for many come to symA totally bizarre interview just started a feud between Ivana and Melania Trump
Ivana Trump —Donald Trump's firstex-wife and mother of Ivanka, Donald Jr., and Eric Trump &mdaFTC split on punishing Mark Zuckerberg in settlement with Facebook
Federal regulators are split on whether to hold Facebook chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg personallyThese coronavirus trackers can help you sort through the info overload
If you're like me, the daily barrage of information about the progress of the coronavirus pandemic cWaymo's new app lets you hail a self
If you were hoping to hail a self-driving car from Waymo, you better live in the Phoenix area -- andThese stock photos put rescue animals center frame
For creatives looking to do a little good, a new collection of stock photos featuring rescue animalsWhat the hell is going on with Matthew Lillard's Instagram account? An investigation.
Even Hollywood's brightest stars are vulnerable to the pain and suffering of Instagram's broken custThe FBI must be stoked about Zoom's encryption policy
Zoom has big privacy plans — for its paying customers, that is.After getting caught falsely clThese stock photos put rescue animals center frame
For creatives looking to do a little good, a new collection of stock photos featuring rescue animalsFacebook CTO Mike Schroepfer does not deserve our pity
The New York Timeshas published a stunningly boot-licking article about Facebook's Chief Technology